The Frontierland Place- Leather Bracelet

DOWN BECAUSE THE 'GORDON BROWN HAS LOST THE ELECTION

The analysis of the British historian and essayist RICHARD NEWBURY the elections 2010 in Great Britain


What happened to New Labour, with Tony Blair in 1997 that had won a majority of 179 seats to the Tories inflicting their worst defeat since 1832?

Why New Labour is finished as well? Why the Conservatives, led by David Cameron as a privileged, and Libdem, led by a more privileged as Nick Clegg, have had such good results? One answer is that Labour's Gordon Brown appeared to leave the area for that elusive call center more comfortable tribal organization and socialist class warfare . This has certainly shored up the vote and allow hard-core the party to live for new battles, but it also means that Labour's Gordon Brown is fishing where those votes could intercept floating essential to a winning strategy. In 2005, at the three-week election campaign, polls gave Blair defeated with 60 seats. Instead he won with 65. What happened? With his political instincts, had realized where they were the erogenous zones of economic voting than they were floating and socially advanced. He had also understood why he, unlike Brown who was born in "tribes" Scottish Labour Party, had "chosen" to join the party and had become the leading scaling the outside. For him it was a choice as a consumer, as is the floating voter, ready to change his party as to change the church. In pluralist societies, there is a market that is gained adherents.

The hard core of voters supporting his party like a football team - to win or lose. The floating voter's chosen according to his personal gain and success follows. It 's impossible to win an election without attracting these voters often fickle, and parties touches seduce them. However, as the center, they too are in constant motion. Where to go, is the story of post-war Britain.

were veterans of World War Two to massively vote for Labour, leading the central planning of social security in times of war and the economy. Conservatives, by accepting the new distribution of wealth, but promising to regulate it better, they won in 1951 and ruled for 13 years. What caused them to lose in 1964 was that they were seen as outsiders to the country, the aristocratic former students of the great private schools. So in fact they were Eden, Macmillan and Home. He won the meritocracy in the person of Harold Wilson's Labour Party.

Margaret Thatcher "stole" the Labour 'Syd', the skilled worker, and seduced by the mirage of the property . Inspired by his move against the Leninist Party Conservative of 'noblesse oblige', in 1983 Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, Peter Mandelson and Alistair Campbell designed the New Labour to win back 'Syd' but in 1992, as Blair well knew, had become a little 'richer and turned in 'Mondeo Man' independent craftsman, with duplex burdened by mortgage and Ford Mondeo. He too had become a conservative and Blair knew that by taxing the rich, taxing its aspirations. So socialism became the Third Way and 1997, with a overwhelming majority of 170 votes - a real surprise - the New Labour found that the Mondeo Man were millions.

In 2001 he became the ordinary man a woman the Worcester Woman bigger house in the suburbs, 4x4, two children. He wanted more money for schools and hospitals and less taxes. "Stealing" the Tory scheme of public-private partnership (Private Finance Initiative) - the private builds schools, hospitals and prisons, and rent them to the government - Blair was able to buy back floating voters. In this election

2010, the floating voter has been identified in a new socio-economic entities: Motorway Man, man motorway. He / she lives in a residential areas built in the last five years along the highways, because it is a technician or a junior manager who travels for hours, eat and surf network in the coffee service area, and dreams of owning a bigger house - and perhaps send their children to a private school became a senior manager. The last time he voted for Blair, but now no longer thinks that conservatives, and especially Dave Cameron, are foreign to its reality and aspirations, but is worried that his house is now worth less than the mortgage.

So the motorway service station has become the battleground of this election: there, quite apart from the people at the pump, there are very few hard-core Labour voters. The Motorway Man has the same DNA floating voter who was the double helix in the body as in the Labour Tory since at least 1945. Tony Blair would be identified and incorporated into a new center: the one where the battle is won by pushing the opponent at the extreme wings, because being seen as "moderate" does win the election and be seen as "extremists" makes you lose.

Answersor Ap Bio Lab 8

Fini's behavior is immoral and politically loser

From reading these days analysts' Farefuturo "I get the segfuenti reflections. I think the question Berlusconi-Fini, beyond the 'decorated with bows' of the media, is much easier than you think.
Fini, to what end reciter, almirantiana formed at the school, since we nominate for President of the Chamber, does not look that visibility. Today, who presented it to Almirante says sorry to have done: seek to conquer personal power by climbing between the mirrors. "A psychoanalyst would say that wants to kill his father, however, Almirante has taken the trouble. Now Berlusconi is the father "(John Salvi).
not forget that he comes from that school. A school whose roots take nourishment from the violent anti-communist protest, but not anti-authoritarian. Do not forget when the kippa on his head covered with ashes to the 'yad vascem' announced to the world that "Fascism was the absolute evil." Do not forget when you submit to Ardeatine utters this phrase: "It 's been with the men of the Resistance the homeland not only survived, but is regenerated.'' To be malicious, on that occasion was attended by representatives of the AMP, and Napolitano ... And yet let us not forget just when the Grim day in the national executive of Berlusconi's PDL pointed out that it has always defiladed meetings of the Bureau. We can not forget when the day after the appointment as Chairman of Parliament criticized the approach that Berlusconi had given the party he had helped to found. Finally, we can not forget the harsh reaction was not consulted ahead of time when Silvio, the infamous "running board" stated that, complete the design of a modern liberal party opposed to the post-communist and post-Marxist culture still dominant in the ganglia of the state, the prime minister as a man of the labeling "comes plebiscite."
This is not a haughty behavior at times tratufesco that does not fit a Head of State? Want to get back in the game? The desire for revenge? Desire for power for power or desire to plunder the federalist idea never died down in Italy? Of course with and with but if you can not do the job to anyone, but if these are the facts, where, as we say in our country, "he is praised for bone and then tirargliele in your pocket," then the attitude in these two-year term of Gianfranco towards his friend Silvio is clearly the light, and becomes even clearer when one considers the statement of the President resentful of the other branch of Parliament: on those conditions, it is better to go to the polls. "
In this context one can not blame those who benefited from a position of power, now claim the right to dissent or even as initially feared, his current party, to those who had "duty paid".
The recent opening of dialogue with Berlusconi Fini has expressed publicly in the "Third House," appears credible had it not been for fifteen years a trickle of criticism of the Government and the Prime Minister in all its externalization from trifles to matters of vital importance , as the bioethical problems, recurring emergency ordinances and the crime of illegal immigration.
ungrateful, faithless, Judas? We want to accept this way of doing politics? Certainly, two strong men of character and ethical value, sooner or later come into conflict. But in the case of a conflict between a vertex of the State and the Chief Executive, appear incomprehensible and destructive for the country, especially if they belong to the same party. In any case
publicly criticize the project that the same Mr Gianfranco Fini had helped to develop is not a good show abroad is reckless, and as such continue on this path history and the voters will eventually be condemned.
final consideration. Really a Speaker of the House should refrain from doing politics? Judging by the way in which until now has been portrayed, you would not. Iotti, Ingrao, Gronkowski, Scalfaro docent. We try too ...!
Regarding its maximum "Pretoria", Italo Bocchino, says much about the game that is still to be played within the party. Political commentators closer to the Palace we probably do know that his resignation "irrevocable" presented close to the meeting of the Assembly of Deputies to decide, he would have been suggested to "hide the divisions among Finian.

Francis Pugliarello